Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Chapter 2: Information Ethics: A profession seeks the truth


We consider truth to be a set in stone idea. The concept of truth has changed throughout history. Telling the truth means being able to recognize the truth and explain it in the clearest way possible. I babysit, and I am also a college student so I've come to the realization that for the most part only kids and drunk people tell the truth. Well, there are some exceptions, I like to think I am pretty honest, or at least my intentions are.
 
Way before we had print and cell phones, oral communication was how information was passed down. This culture linked truth to remembrance, because the human brain only has so much capacity for information so we had to remember the key facts. This reminds me of the game telephone, when we whisper in the ear and pass a phrase down a long line of people, the message at the end is usually distorted from what the sender originally intended. There is also the phrase "seeing is believing" and that truth has to be visual for some people. My mom is one of those people who doesn't want to hear an apology, she wants to see it in action.
 
Seeing is believing when we are trying to sell a product. In advertisement we can sell false truths to our audience to get them engaged in a product. I buy beauty products that claim to do everything under the sun, but its effects don't always add up to what it claims to do. When we see something on our screen, be it computer or television, we assume that it has to be true... it is there right before our eyes in color and pixels. How could it be false? We forget to take into account how edited our society and the media it produces has become. With the right editing, cutting, splicing, pasting, and Photoshopping we can create the truth we wish people to see.
 
Plato linked truth to human rationality and intellect. Others believe truth is revealed by only God and the Church. Truth has become increasingly tied to what is written down, what can be empirically verified, and what can be perceived by the human senses.
 
Then along came objectivity into the realm of journalism. Objectivity watered down is the requirement that journalists divorce fact from opinion. Its premise is to refuse to allow individual bias to influence what is reported and how.
We now have to decipher facts and truth with the world wide web. This overflow of information means we have to be wary of underlying views. Convergence journalism, using sounds, images, and words to cover stories, is now widespread in online news outlets like The Huffington Post. We now have even more information to sift through to decipher what's true, relevant, and important to us individually. This made me think how one story can have a profound affect on DIFFERENT audiences. Take the award shows for example; okay I am not interested in the written articles but I sure would love to see the best dresses and beauty products/tips from the night. Where as say, an avid music listener like Professor Limon is more interested in who won best song at the Grammy's. Advertisers may be interested in product placement during award ceremonies or sponsorship. With our own interests being the driving force, information is given to us an a customize able way. Remember those surveys that tell us what kind of learner we are? That sort of reminds me how convergence journalism can be put to good use- I really just want to see the video from event A so I will just watch the video feed from my favorite news site.
 
We discussed in my prior communications class how a news story comes into being, like who picks out this stuff anyway? Close your eyes and picture a journalist. I pictured someone that looks like Stephen Colbert. Journalists have primarily been white males, from middle to upper class with high education backgrounds. Our book discusses how journalists look like the people they are working for; the vibrant and optimistic middle and upper class.The press has to be aware of the contradictions that come with the job descriptions of a reporter. They must be neutral yet investigative, fair minded but have an edge.
 
When we package the news story we have to add elements that will pique human interest. This reminds me of our previous Communication class on reporting, we were given assignments to write leads and short stories. In the instance of stories like the cop cars, drunk drivers, and cars driving into gas meters, word placement and choice was crucial. The most important thing came first, so that we could grab the audience. Then we would add drama by adding in juicy words like "scared" "terrified" etc. Our book also touched on how science is reported in the media: either "new hope" or "no hope" when really there is grey areas. We tend to report peak moments and not the actual process that led to catastrophes and chaos.
 
Truth is more than just a collection of facts. We have to be our own investigators and researchers and use an open mind to new truths that are revealed to us. Staying educated and staying current is crucial.
 
 
 

Saturday, January 25, 2014

Chapter 1 Notes

I have always been a fan of quotes and the people who say them. I think I idolize people who are virtuous and model ethical behavior. Aristotle said that a way to learn ethics is to select heroes that  you admire and model behavior according to what you think they would do. It is important to also have a mind of your own and not just copy off of what they do. I use this tactic in my daily life by picking traits I like about certain people and trying to model them myself. Aristotle also said that you can become something by doing acts that are related to it; for example you can become brave by doing brave acts.

Immanuel Kant coined categorical imperative, which implies that you should act so your choices could be universal law and treat humanity as an end, never as just a means. For me this is the hardest theory to grasp because it focuses on the action itself. I tend to associate ethics as a more personal thing and that it would come down to the person who is deciding in the ethical dilemma. Aristotle believes in placing the emphasis on the actor as well. However things like rules that have been set in stone could apply here, and that everyone must follow by these rules. We have to act from a sense of duty rather than what we personally want. I disagree with this view because 1.) I am selfish and think life is too short to be straight edged and miserable abiding by every rule that is set in front of you. 2.) The people I admire are ones that took risks and did things for themselves and focused on their dreams rather than on ethical duty. I don't agree with being reckless but I do agree with being selfish, within reason.

Utilitarianism views harming one person for the benefit of a larger group as ethical. It can more clearly identify right and wrong and conflicts are better resolved. It focuses on the consequences of an action. It makes quantity and quality equal- no one is placed higher than the other or given advantages.